|
Right POV |
|||||
|
|
Article Archives | Political Links | About the Author | ||
|
By: Sandra Price Let’s take a look at the latest Federal assault on State Rights, which of course is the ultimate assault on personal choices. No, it is not Abortion but something just as dangerous to the U.S. Constitution. The
Social Conservatives, neo cons, Christian Coalition, Bush Republicans,
it doesn’t matter what you call them, want control of the citizens in Apparently
the American people are getting a tad tired of this intrusive new
Administration trying to take the position of being the moral court of
final choices for all citizens of the We need to discuss, in detail, among our own family members what we want, as individuals, on personal choices for those last months of our lives when we are told that our condition is terminal and could be painful, degrading to our dignity and certainly financially impossible for our next of kin to handle. We all realize that anyone in the last throes of a deadly and debilitating disease could simply put a gun in his/her mouth and blow their brains out. Many would rather not leave this last impression and mess for our loved ones to witness as it puts death in the category of horror rather than a natural end of life. It is time for the American people and the government to realize that death is something we all have to face eventually and if left to the individual would prefer facing it as a natural consequence of life. In The end of life choices for patients with M.S. Alzheimer’s, Cancer, ALS and many more terminal diseases is critical for them to make when they never know how much they will suffer and afflict their violence on others during those last weeks or months of their lives.. Whether these choices are offered by organizations like The Hemlock Society, Death With Dignity, End of Life Choices or Compassion and Choices, they should be discussed in every individual family home instead of waiting for the Federal Government to hand out our instructions. Why won’t the government allow this ultimate choice to be made by us? I believe this intrusion of power comes from the concept that Americans are too ignorant to realize the message from God. The flurry of the religious right to legislate that life begins at conception will rewrite the U.S. Constitution and force every American to look to the Federal Government to lead us around like ignorant animals who cannot make these decisions for ourselves. I do not believe the Federal Government should take the responsibility of speaking for God on any part of our lives. In
President Bush’s last term in office, the determination to remove
personal choices from the American citizens is getting emotional and
critical. If he is allowed
to continue with the removal of these choices, Do we
need this kind of control? Absolutely
some do! We saw the need for
total control just a few weeks ago when so many Americans in the gulf
states were unable to leave a disaster scene when so many simply died
from lack of survival skills. Without
the federal government swooping down to save the people of Yes many Americans cannot survive these disasters and many will die from having no options or choices given to them but is that any excuse for the Federal Government to assume we are all helpless in our making the decisions of our lives? It should be no shock to anyone that I am a Fiscal Conservative who wants the Federal Government to stay out of our personal lives and hand them over to the individual states. I have been screaming for a limited federal government since my first vote for Ike. The Republican Party was based on limited government, individual freedoms and personal responsibilities and it is a shock to many of us to see our Republican Party now wanting to remove our options and choices on so many issues. No one is
demanding that a terminally ill person be given medication to shut down
their body but we are offering the choice to request it.
Each state has laws that explain that if a patient is unable to
request medication to end their suffering, and they left no directions,
it is up to the state to make the decision for them.
In the case of On
Wednesday October 5, 2005 the U.S. Supreme Court will begin deciding on
the State of Oregon’s “Death with Dignity” law that allows a
terminal patient, who has been determined to have less than 6 months to
live and is in sound mind to request a doctor’s prescription to be
filled when the patient has had reached the limit of his/her pain
capacity. Once they have
that prescription in their hands the choice is theirs to make when it is
filled and taken. This
decision was voted on by the citizens of The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court is to determine whether Oregon even had the Constitutional Right to bring this choice to the voters. The action was started by then Attorney General John Ashcroft who tried to control what the Oregon Physicians could prescribe which is not within the Federal Government’s authority. The U S. Supreme court sent it back to the states at that time and we can only hope they do so again. Will we Americans give the Supreme Court the authority to tell us that life begins at conception and only they can tell us when we can die? Do we as citizens of a free nation want to give up our personal choices to the current Administration? These decisions cannot be reversed and each and every one of us should make our own determinations on when life begins and ends. The Bush
Administration is taking too deep an interest in our personal lives and
never in the history of I realize that millions of members of the religious right figured that they could now start legislating the morals of the American people and that we gave them this right when we voted for Bush in 2000. We gave them no such right and assumed that Bush would respect the Bill of Rights. Amendment X “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” |
|||||
Copyright © 2005